Research Ethics and Integrity
The university is committed to ensuring that the following research ethics objectives are achieved:
- To ensure that any research activity undertaken by staff or students meets the highest standards and is compliant with the code of practice issued by the UKRIO and the UUK Concordat to support Research Integrity.
- To ensure that risks relating to sensitive projects which may have a profound impact on the environment, communities or individuals are proportionately controlled without exposing individuals, or the environment, to unnecessary risk.
- To ensure that projects involving animals, humans, human material or human data are only permitted when there is no alternative research technique and the expected benefits outweigh any possible adverse effects.
Coventry University requires all research to be submitted for ethical review and clearance as a matter of priority. All staff and students are required to obtain ethical approval before undertaking any research. Approval may also be required for other, non-research, activities involving human participants. Staff are responsible for following the internal process and supervisors of students are responsible for ensuring that their students do the same.
The Group University Research Ethics Committee is responsible for ensuring that any research activity undertaken by staff or students meets the highest ethical standards and is in line with its policy on governance.
These principles and standards apply to all research irrespective of whether it is unfunded, internally funded or externally funded through Research Councils, other public monies, or any other sources.
Ethical approval is required before undertaking any:
- Research, design studies, product development, artistic studies or experiments
- Survey work, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups or case studies.
The university may require ethical approval for:
- Controversial or non-controversial literary or artistic works.
- Paid or un-paid internal or external consultancy work.
This is especially true if the activity requires or could involve:
- Active or unintentional participation by human participants.
- The use of tissue, cells, genetic material or body fluids from living or dead human participants (this is also covered under the Human Tissue Act 2007).
- Actual or potential disclosure and storage of personal or confidential information (this is also covered by the Data Protection Act 2018).
- An ethical, safety, moral or legal dilemma for the researcher and/or participants in allowing the activity to proceed.
The overarching responsibility of the University Group Research Ethics Committee (REC) is to promote a research environment that is underpinned by a culture of integrity and based on good governance, best practice and support for the development of researchers in line with the University Research Conduct and Ethics Policy.
The committee has the interlinked functions of:
- Providing support and advice to researchers and others on matters relating to research integrity
- Working in conjunction with faculties and research centres, ensuring that any ethics issues associated with research projects conducted by university staff or students of any level (and whether externally or internally funded) have been appropriately considered, addressed, and approved before the projects begin, and good ethical practice is employed as projects are delivered.
The REC reports to University Research Committee:
- Chair – Prof Nigel Berkeley, Institute Director and Academic Lead for Research Ethics and Integrity
- Deputy Chair – Sally Puzey, Director of Research Services
- Prof Nigel Berkeley, Academic Lead for Research Ethics and Integrity
- Sophie Krumins, Research Ethics and Integrity Manager
For queries related to research ethics or integrity matters, please contact the university’s Research Ethics and Integrity Manager via email@example.com.
Academic Research Integrity Annual Statements:
Responsible Use of Indicators in Research Evaluation Standard
The University recognises the importance of using metrics responsibly. To this end, the Responsible Use of Indicators in Research Evaluation Standard sets out the University’s approach to the responsible use of metrics. Aligned with the 10 principles of the Leiden Manifesto, this standard aims to provide clarity for those involved in producing and understanding metrics, as well as enabling good practice across the group.
Publications and Open Access Standard
The University is committed to ensuring free access to all research outputs via its institutional repository, Pure, in order to maximise its usefulness to the wider research community and society in general. The Publications and Open Access Standard outlines the University’s approach, which aims to support researchers to meet funder and REF requirements, whilst also ensuring the long-term preservation and access to research outputs.
For queries about the university's standards, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.